Archives: Commentary Reviews

Reset

Amos, Jonah & Micah

AdvancedPastors-in-trainingUseful supplement
7.9
Author: JoAnna M. Hoyt
Bible Book: Amos Jonah Micah
Series: Evangelical Exegetical Commentary
Type: Expository
Publisher: Lexham Press
Resource Type: Commentary

Summary

We are grateful for commentaries that help us preach the Minor Prophets with both bite and balance. Amos confronts complacency and injustice with blazing clarity. Jonah exposes our self righteousness and magnifies the Lord’s mercy. Micah brings both judgement and hope, including promises that shape the church’s expectation of a faithful ruler. Preaching these books well demands attention to context, structure, and tone. A combined volume can serve us if it helps each book retain its own voice while also clarifying their shared prophetic burdens.

We also need help avoiding common pitfalls. With Amos, we can preach ethics without the covenantal framework and end up with moralism. With Jonah, we can preach the fish and miss the heart. With Micah, we can quote famous passages and ignore the surrounding argument. A serious commentary can help us read whole sections, follow the prophetic logic, and see how indictment and invitation belong together.

Because this is a large volume, it is best used as a planned companion. It can provide sustained engagement with difficult texts, explain key historical and literary features, and help us preach with clarity. We are served when it presses us to keep the text central, then to bring it to bear on the church with reverence and courage.

Strengths

First, a full commentary can help us handle Amos with appropriate severity. Amos is not polite. It is covenant lawsuit preaching. The book exposes hollow worship and comfortable religion. A careful exposition will help us show why those indictments land, and how they relate to God’s holiness and justice. That keeps application from becoming vague activism. It becomes covenantal confrontation that drives to repentance and renewed worship.

Second, Jonah needs careful handling of satire and irony. Jonah is a prophet who resents mercy. That should humble us. We need help preaching Jonah so that the congregation sees their own heart in the prophet’s heart. A careful commentary can help us trace how the narrative exposes our desire to control grace. It also helps us preach the Lord’s compassion without reducing it to sentiment.

Third, Micah’s mixture of judgement and hope requires structure. The book moves through cycles of indictment and promise. If we preach it as fragments, we will confuse people. A commentary that clarifies those movements helps us preach with coherence and hope. Micah also contains promises that point forward to the Lord’s saving work. We need to handle those promises with confidence and with contextual care.

Limitations

The limitation of a combined volume is focus. Each book deserves sustained attention, and a single volume covering three can sometimes feel heavy. It can also feel like a lot to consult if we are only preaching one book at a time. That said, the size can be a strength when it gives ample space to each book. We simply need to use it selectively, according to our preaching plan.

As with many academic commentaries, we should also remember that technical discussion does not automatically become sermon clarity. We still need to work hard at structure, illustration, and tone. We need to pray for courage to preach judgement texts, and for tenderness to preach mercy texts.

How We Would Use It

We would use this as a main reference when preaching any of these books, especially for structural planning. Start with repeated reading, outline the major movements, then consult the commentary for interpretive issues and guidance on flow. We would also use it to keep application text tethered. Amos should confront worship. Jonah should humble our entitlement. Micah should lead us to hope in the Lord who shepherds His people.

In training settings, this volume can help pastors in training learn how to preach prophetic literature without flattening it into slogans, and without turning it into speculation.

Closing Recommendation

This is a substantial tool for preaching Amos, Jonah, and Micah with care. It best suits those willing to plan ahead, read slowly, and let the prophets set the agenda for what the church needs to hear.

Daniel

AdvancedPastors-in-trainingStrong recommendation
8.0
Author: J. Paul Tanner
Bible Book: Daniel
Series: Evangelical Exegetical Commentary
Type: Expository
Publisher: Lexham Press
Resource Type: Commentary

Summary

We preach Daniel in a cultural moment that often feels like exile. That can tempt us to use the book as a set of motivational stories or as a launchpad for speculative end times debates. Daniel will not cooperate with either approach. It gives us court narratives that teach fidelity, and it gives us apocalyptic visions that train hope, humility, and endurance. A serious commentary can help us hold these two halves together, so that our people see one coherent message rather than two unrelated genres.

Daniel demands careful attention to structure. The narratives are not merely children’s stories. They are theological accounts of the Lord’s sovereignty over empires and over rulers. The visions are not puzzles to master. They are revelations meant to strengthen saints under pressure, reminding us that God rules, that evil has limits, and that the kingdom will come. A helpful commentary will guide us through literary features, historical setting, and key interpretive questions, while resisting sensationalism.

We want support for preaching that is both courageous and calm. Daniel teaches us how to live faithfully in public life without panic, and how to pray when the future feels uncertain. It also teaches us that God’s deliverance may be immediate, or it may be final and resurrection shaped. That distinction matters for pastoral honesty.

Strengths

First, a substantial commentary can help us preach the narratives with depth. Daniel 1 to 6 includes moral courage, yes, but it also includes worship, prayer, repentance, and the Lord’s defence of His own glory. If exposition attends to the chapters as theological units, it prevents shallow hero worship. We can honour Daniel’s faith without turning him into the centre.

Second, we need careful handling of the visions. There are interpretive debates that cannot be avoided. Yet we can address them without making them the main event. The main event is God’s sovereignty and the call to endurance. A good commentary helps us see what is clear, what is debated, and how to preach the clear with confidence while holding the debated with humility.

Third, Daniel’s pastoral usefulness rises when we see its prayerfulness. Daniel’s response to revelation is not speculation, it is prayer and obedience. That is a crucial corrective. When the future is disclosed, the proper response is faithful worship and steady perseverance. We need help preaching that emphasis, so that our people are formed into resilient disciples rather than anxious chart makers.

Limitations

As with other large volumes, the limitation is time. It is hard to use well under pressure. We should also remember that Daniel’s apocalyptic imagery requires careful teaching. A commentary can help, but we still need to shepherd our people patiently, especially if they bring strong assumptions. Our goal is not to win debates, but to build hope and holiness under the Lord’s reign.

We should also guard against letting technical detail overwhelm proclamation. Daniel is meant to produce courage, humility, and prayerful endurance. We must keep that aim in view as we consult deeper resources.

How We Would Use It

We would use this as a primary reference in a preaching series, especially for the vision chapters where misreading is common. We would start by mapping the structure of the book, then consult the commentary for interpretive guidance and clarity on the flow. We would also use it to shape applications that stay tethered to the book’s own aims: fidelity, prayer, and hope in the kingdom of God.

In training settings, this can help pastors in training learn how to handle apocalyptic literature responsibly, with confidence in Scripture and with restraint in speculation.

Closing Recommendation

This is a substantial tool for those who want to preach Daniel with seriousness and balance. It will serve best where we have time to read, to pray, and to let the book form our instincts as much as it informs our outlines.

Ezekiel

AdvancedAdvanced students / scholarsUseful supplement
7.9
Author: John Goldingay
Bible Book: Ezekiel
Series: Evangelical Exegetical Commentary
Type: Expository
Publisher: Lexham Press
Resource Type: Commentary

Summary

We come to Ezekiel needing help with a book that is both visually arresting and theologically intense. It confronts sin with severity, it speaks judgement with frightening clarity, and it also offers hope that is grounded in the Lord’s zeal for His name. Preaching Ezekiel requires careful handling. If we rush, we will confuse people. If we soften, we will blunt the Word. A large commentary can serve us if it helps us follow the structure, understand the imagery, and keep the message coherent across long sections.

Ezekiel is also a book of sustained prophetic argument. It is not merely a collection of vivid moments. There is a logic to the judgement oracles, a reason for the sign acts, and a pastoral aim in the promises of restoration. We need to see how the Lord exposes false confidence, dismantles idolatry, and then rebuilds hope through covenant promises. We also need to handle the temple vision and the restoration sections without turning them into speculative charts.

A full commentary in this series is likely to be used as a major reference rather than as a quick read. We will benefit most when we plan ahead. Ezekiel often requires patient work with context, especially with repeated phrases and symbolic actions. The goal is not to impress, it is to preach so that God’s holiness and God’s mercy are both felt.

Strengths

First, we are served when a commentary helps us keep the book’s structure visible. That matters for preaching series. Ezekiel can feel sprawling to hearers if we do not guide them. A structured approach helps us show why the judgement sections are as long as they are, and why the restoration promises arrive when they do. It helps us show that the Lord is not volatile. He is righteous, patient, and faithful to His word.

Second, we need help with imagery and symbolism. Ezekiel’s visions can be mishandled in two opposite ways. We can domesticate them, turning them into vague metaphors, or we can over interpret them, turning every detail into a secret code. A wise commentary helps us avoid both errors. It pushes us to ask what the imagery is doing in its context, and how it functions to confront and to comfort.

Third, a substantial work can help us maintain theological coherence. Ezekiel speaks repeatedly about the Lord acting for His name’s sake. That is not cold. It is covenant love. It means the Lord’s commitment to His glory is the very foundation of His commitment to His people. When we preach that well, it produces humility and assurance together.

Limitations

The obvious limitation is size. A 976 page volume is not a casual tool. It will demand time. We should not expect to consult it profitably without planning. There is also a pastoral limitation inherent in any large reference work. The commentary can help us understand, but it cannot create the reverence and trembling we need when preaching judgement. That must be sought from the Lord in prayer.

We should also remember that Ezekiel includes difficult sections that will require additional pastoral sensitivity. The commentary may help with meaning, but we still need to think carefully about how to speak to different hearers and different wounds.

How We Would Use It

We would use this in a preaching series with an early start. Outline the book, plan units, then consult the commentary for interpretive decisions and structural clarity. We would use it especially for the vision passages and the restoration sections, where misreading is common. We would also use it to ensure that our applications remain tethered to the text, rather than driven by contemporary speculation.

For teaching and training, it can serve advanced students and leaders who want to handle Ezekiel responsibly, with attention to both its original setting and its canonical role.

Closing Recommendation

This is a major resource suited to those who want a serious companion for Ezekiel. It is best for planned preaching and deeper study, and it can help us preach with clarity, gravity, and steady hope in the Lord who restores for His name’s sake.

Esther

AdvancedPastors-in-trainingStrong recommendation
8.0
Author: Anthony J. Tomasino
Bible Book: Esther
Series: Evangelical Exegetical Commentary
Type: Expository
Publisher: Lexham Press
Resource Type: Commentary

Summary

We approach Esther needing help with a book that feels both dramatic and subtle. The plot moves quickly, yet the theological weight is often carried through irony, reversal, and quiet providence. A good commentary must help us see the narrative artistry, follow the structure, and preach the book without either flattening it into moral lessons or sidelining it as mere history. This volume is designed to assist that careful work by giving sustained attention to the text and its movement.

In a series that aims to serve evangelical readers with serious engagement, the strengths we look for are consistent. We want a clear grasp of the argument, careful handling of language where it matters, and attention to context, including historical setting and literary design. We also want help in moving from explanation to proclamation in a way that keeps the Lord’s faithfulness central, even when the divine name is not made explicit in the narrative.

Used well, this commentary can help us preach Esther with patience. The book trains us to notice the patterns that drive the story, including feasting and fasting, public honour and public shame, hidden plans and exposed schemes. Those patterns are not decorative. They serve the message that the Lord preserves His people even when they are vulnerable and compromised, and that He does so through ordinary means that may not look glorious at the time.

Strengths

First, we are helped to read the book as a unified narrative with intention. That protects us from cherry picking favourite scenes. Esther is not a collection of inspirational moments. It is a carefully crafted story of reversal. When we preach it, the whole shape matters. This kind of guidance supports preaching that is faithful to the flow rather than driven by our own preferred topics.

Second, the commentary’s careful attention to context can help avoid both naivety and cynicism. Esther includes court politics, personal vulnerability, and morally messy decisions. We need help speaking about those realities with honesty while still holding to God’s sovereign preservation. A serious commentary can help us name the complexity without becoming suspicious of the text. We can acknowledge what is troubling without stepping away from trust in God’s Word.

Third, a work like this can serve pastors by giving them interpretive confidence. Esther is often preached in a thin way, either as a call to courage with little gospel depth, or as a vague story about providence with little textual grounding. We need to show our people why we are saying what we are saying. A fuller commentary supports that work by giving structure, explaining key decisions, and helping us see how themes recur and develop.

Limitations

The main limitation for many pastors will be the time required to use it well. A more detailed commentary demands that we slow down. That is a strength, but it also means this will not always be the first book we open when a deadline is tight. It is best used early in preparation, alongside our own repeated reading of the text.

Another limitation is that a commentary can give information without giving homiletical direction. We still need to do the work of crafting sermons, shaping applications, and finding appropriate tone for our people. This volume can support that work, but it cannot replace it.

How We Would Use It

We would use this as a main desk companion when preaching Esther. Start with repeated reading of the narrative, mapping scenes and reversals. Then consult the commentary for help with structure, interpretive questions, and the flow of themes. We would also use it to avoid simplistic moralising, especially around Esther and Mordecai. Instead, we would aim to show God’s preserving mercy to undeserving people, and the comfort of His hidden hand.

In training contexts, this can help younger preachers learn how to handle narrative carefully, how to read whole scenes, and how to make applications that arise from the text rather than from modern slogans.

Closing Recommendation

This is a substantial tool for those who want to preach Esther with careful attention and serious engagement. It is best suited to pastors and students who are willing to work slowly, so that the clarity of the sermon reflects the clarity of the text.

All Things For Good

IntroductoryGeneral readersStrong recommendation
8.4
Author: Thomas Watson
Bible Book: Romans
Series: Puritan Paperbacks
Type: Devotional
Publisher: Banner of Truth
Resource Type: Puritans

Summary

We open All Things For Good to the promise that God works in His providence for the benefit of His people. The aim is not to offer sentimental comfort, but to strengthen faith under pressure. Watson writes as a pastor who expects real suffering, real temptation, and real spiritual weariness. He does not treat Romans 8:28 as a slogan. He treats it as a sturdy plank that can bear weight when life feels unstable.

This book is devotional in the best sense. It is not detached from doctrine, and it is not detached from experience. Watson wants believers to think accurately about God, then to live with steadier hearts. He traces how God uses affliction, disappointment, and delay for sanctification, and he repeatedly turns us away from self focused interpretations of events. We are not the centre. God is. That is precisely why His providence can be trusted.

Because the work is compact, it reads well over a few sittings. Yet it is also the kind of book we can return to in pastoral care. It gives language for prayer when people cannot find their own words. It helps us say something more substantial than, “It will be fine.” It teaches us to put weight on God’s character and on God’s promises.

Strengths

First, it speaks honestly about suffering without falling into bitterness. Watson assumes that trials will come, and that they will test our faith. He refuses to reduce hardship to mere lessons. Instead, he calls us to look at God Himself, to see His wisdom, and to trust His timing. That kind of realism is often what struggling believers need. We are helped to interpret our lives within the larger care of the Father.

Second, Watson’s method is both doctrinal and practical. He gives reasons for confidence, not merely exhortations. He shows how God’s purposes can include humbling pride, weaning us from idols, deepening prayer, and clarifying hope. That is not a cold analysis. It is a pastoral attempt to help believers endure, repent, and worship.

Third, the writing is memorable. There is a sharpness to the way he frames the heart. He exposes the subtle ways we complain against providence while still using religious language. For pastors, that can help us address common temptations gently but clearly. It also helps us preach Romans 8 with more weight, so that comfort is rooted in truth, not in mood.

Limitations

The limitations are mostly those of genre and era. Watson can move quickly with strong assertions that assume shared theological categories. Some readers will need a little help bridging those assumptions. There is also a risk that readers use the book to diagnose others rather than to examine themselves. As with many devotional classics, the best use is humble and prayerful.

Because it is not a verse by verse commentary, we should not expect careful exegesis of every line in Romans 8. It is an extended meditation on a central promise. Used that way, it serves well.

How We Would Use It

We would use this for personal devotion and for pastoral care. It works well for a believer walking through grief, anxiety, or prolonged frustration. It also works well for strengthening a congregation’s theology of providence, which in turn strengthens courage for obedience. We can also use it in leadership settings, because leaders are often tempted to interpret difficulties as failure rather than as fatherly discipline.

For preaching, it can enrich application. It helps us press the promise of Romans 8:28 into the varied experiences of our people, while keeping the promise tethered to God’s saving purpose in Christ.

Closing Recommendation

This is a small, bracing, and deeply consoling book. It is best read with a Bible open, and with the humility that says, “Lord, teach us to trust You when we cannot trace You.”

The Art Of Prophesying

Mid-levelBusy pastorsStrong recommendation
8.3
Author: William Perkins
Series: Puritan Paperbacks
Type: Devotional
Publisher: Banner of Truth
Resource Type: Puritans

Summary

We come to The Art Of Prophesying looking for help with the work of preaching, not as a performance, but as ministry before God. This is a short book, yet it carries a serious ambition. It aims to train the preacher to handle Scripture with clarity, to read with reverence, and to speak so that the conscience is addressed, the mind is instructed, and Christ is honoured. Even where some language belongs to another era, the pastoral burden is recognisably timeless.

What we find here is a method shaped by confidence that God speaks in His Word. Perkins is not interested in cleverness. He is interested in faithful labour that makes the meaning plain, then presses it home. The centre of gravity is not technique for technique’s sake. It is the conviction that Scripture has an intended sense, and that the preacher is a servant of that sense. The preacher’s calling is to draw out what is there, then bring it to bear on living people.

We should read this with an awareness of its historical setting. Some categories and assumptions reflect the time. Yet the core instincts are remarkably sound. He refuses to detach doctrine from application. He refuses to treat application as mere moralising. He urges us to know the text well enough that we can speak to the varied conditions of the hearers. That is not gimmickry, it is pastoral care through the Word.

Strengths

First, it is relentlessly text driven. We are pushed to attend to the argument, the words, and the structure. The method encourages patient reading. It keeps us close to authorial intent and therefore guards us from hobby horses. In a ministry climate that rewards instant takes, this is a salutary rebuke. We are reminded that clarity is not a personality trait, it is the fruit of careful work.

Second, Perkins insists that preaching aims at transformation under God. We are not merely delivering information. We are handling the living Word. That gives the book a steady spiritual realism. It expects resistance, distractions, and self deception. It assumes that both preacher and hearer need grace. The best parts of the work feel like pastoral wisdom learned over years, expressed with simplicity rather than fog.

Third, it helps us think about application without flattening the gospel. Perkins gives categories for addressing different kinds of hearers, and that can help pastors as we prepare sermons for mixed congregations. There is also a helpful emphasis on order. A sermon should have a shape. The listener should be able to follow. That is not cosmetic, it is loving. If our people cannot follow us, we have not served them well.

Limitations

The chief limitation is that we are reading a historical manual, not a contemporary preaching textbook. Some phrasing and some assumptions need translation into modern pastoral settings. There is also a risk that readers treat the method as a template rather than as training in wisdom. If we turn this into a rigid checklist, we will miss the point. The book is trying to form instincts, not merely produce outlines.

We also need to remember that this is a compact guide. It will not answer every question about preaching, nor will it address every modern pressure. We will still need to think carefully about our own congregational context and about the demands of particular biblical genres.

How We Would Use It

We would use this as a sharpening tool for sermon preparation habits. Read a short section, then apply it immediately to next week’s passage. Let it expose where we have been lazy with structure, or vague with meaning, or thin with application. It also works well for reading with another pastor or a trainee, because it provokes concrete discussion about what we do when we preach.

We would also use it to remind ourselves what preaching is for. Our goal is not to be interesting. Our goal is to be faithful. That simple reset is a gift.

Closing Recommendation

This is a small book with a weighty pastoral centre. It will reward slow reading and repeated use, especially for those who want preaching that is clear, biblically governed, and aimed at the heart.

Ezra & Nehemiah

Mid-levelBusy pastorsStrong recommendation
8.0
Author: Israel P. Loken
Bible Book: Ezra Nehemiah
Series: Evangelical Exegetical Commentary
Type: Expository
Publisher: Lexham Press
Theological Perspective: Broadly Evangelical
Resource Type: Commentary

Summary

Ezra and Nehemiah are books about restoration that refuses triumphalism. The people return, the temple is rebuilt, the walls are raised, and the Word is read. Yet the story repeatedly shows weakness, opposition, compromise, and the need for ongoing reform. Israel P. Loken’s volume in the Evangelical Exegetical Commentary series aims to help us read these books as covenant restoration under the hand of the Lord. We are reminded that the Lord’s faithfulness stands behind every step, and that spiritual renewal always begins with hearing and obeying the Word.

This commentary is especially useful for keeping the two books connected. Ezra focuses on temple and worship, then on reform under the Word. Nehemiah focuses on leadership, rebuilding, and community formation, yet it too turns repeatedly to prayer and Scripture. Loken helps us see that both books are teaching the same reality, the Lord restores His people so that they may live as His distinct community, and that restoration is fragile when the heart is double minded.

For pastors, the material has obvious relevance. Many churches know something of rebuilding, re establishing patterns, and facing opposition. These books can be misused as leadership manuals detached from redemptive context. Loken regularly encourages us to keep the theological centre in view, the Lord is keeping His promises, preserving His worship, and forming a holy people. That enables application that is realistic and gospel shaped, rather than merely motivational.

Strengths

First, the commentary helps us track structure and repeated themes, prayer, the Word, opposition, and covenant faithfulness. That is crucial for preaching. It is easy to focus on the dramatic moments, the wall completed, the people weeping at the reading of the law, and miss the quieter insistence that real renewal is sustained by ordinary obedience.

Second, Loken’s handling of reform passages is particularly important. Ezra 9 to 10 and Nehemiah 13 raise pastoral questions about holiness, separation, and community discipline. A good commentary must help us read these passages in their covenant setting, and then guide us away from harshness on one side and compromise on the other. This volume provides a steady route through those tensions, keeping the holiness of God and the mercy of God together.

Third, the commentary can support leadership training. Nehemiah’s example is not a generic model for success. It is a picture of prayerful dependence, courage under pressure, and commitment to God’s Word. Loken helps us apply those themes without turning the narrative into a set of slogans.

Limitations

Some readers will want more extended engagement with historical questions and chronology. This series aims to serve exposition, so it may not satisfy every curiosity about Persian period detail. Pastors may also want to supplement this with a more explicitly Christ centred biblical theological work, especially when preaching how restoration hope stretches beyond this partial return toward the final restoration in Christ.

How We Would Use It

We would use this commentary for planning a preaching series that holds Ezra and Nehemiah together, and for preparing the reform and covenant renewal chapters where pastoral sensitivity is needed. We would also use it for teaching leaders about prayerful dependence and Word shaped community life.

In discipleship, these books can help a church embrace patient obedience. The work is often slow, the opposition is real, and the heart needs repeated correction. Loken helps us keep that realism visible, and to keep the Lord’s faithful hand in the foreground. That encourages perseverance without pretending that restoration is painless.

Closing Recommendation

We recommend this as a useful mid level guide for preaching and teaching Ezra and Nehemiah. It offers steady exposition, a clear sense of theological centre, and practical help for handling the books with both conviction and pastoral care.

2 Kings

Mid-levelBusy pastorsStrong recommendation
8.1
Author: John N. Oswalt
Bible Book: 2 Kings
Series: Evangelical Exegetical Commentary
Type: Expository
Publisher: Lexham Press
Theological Perspective: Broadly Evangelical
Resource Type: Commentary

Summary

Second Kings is a long march toward exile, punctuated by prophetic mercy and repeated opportunities to return. It is a sobering book, yet it is not bleak. The Lord is patient. His Word continues to come. His prophets continue to speak. His hand is seen in judgment, but also in preservation and promise. John N. Oswalt’s volume in the Evangelical Exegetical Commentary series helps us read 2 Kings as covenant history with pastoral purpose. The book is teaching us why exile happens, and why the only true hope is the Lord’s faithfulness rather than human reform.

Oswalt is particularly helpful in keeping the structure from becoming a blur. The rapid succession of kings can feel repetitive, especially if we treat each reign as a moral lesson detached from the covenant frame. This commentary helps us see the repeated patterns as deliberate. The author is showing the steady fruit of idolatry, the hardening of the people, and the inevitability of judgment when repentance is refused. Yet at the same time, the author is showing the Lord’s ongoing pursuit through prophetic ministry.

The Elisha narratives, the reform of Hezekiah, and the tragedy of Manasseh are treated as part of that larger argument. We are helped to see why reforms, even sincere ones, cannot ultimately heal the heart of a nation. That pushes us toward a deeper need, new covenant mercy, a true King, and a people whose hearts are changed. The commentary does not shout those conclusions at every turn, but it sets the text clearly so that we can preach them faithfully.

Strengths

First, the commentary keeps covenant categories in view. That is essential for preaching 2 Kings. The exile is not an accident of international politics. It is the covenant curse for covenant unfaithfulness. Oswalt helps us see how the narrative repeatedly signals that logic, often through brief but weighty evaluations of each king.

Second, there is good help for handling prophetic material inside narrative. The miracles and signs are not mere spectacle. They are revelations of the Lord’s authority and mercy, and they often serve as warnings to a people drifting toward judgment. Oswalt helps us avoid both scepticism and sensationalism. We can preach the miracles as real acts of the living God, while keeping the theological point central.

Third, the commentary is pastorally usable for calling the church to repentance and perseverance. 2 Kings is not just a history lesson. It is a warning for the people of God. When the church grows casual about worship, or negotiates with sin, 2 Kings shows the long term outcome. Oswalt helps us keep that warning sober and text based.

Limitations

Those looking for extended academic debate will find this more restrained than some technical works. That is often an advantage for pastors, but it may leave certain questions less explored than you would like. As with the companion volume, you will also need to do the final work of shaping Christ centred proclamation, using the clear covenant logic the commentary provides.

How We Would Use It

We would use this commentary when planning how to preach 2 Kings in manageable units, and when preparing the key reform and exile chapters. It is also valuable for teaching on repentance, because the book shows both the possibility of real reform and the limits of reform when the heart remains unchanged.

For pastoral ministry, 2 Kings can sharpen our sense of spiritual drift. We do not want to alarm tender consciences, yet we do want to warn against the slow normalising of sin. Oswalt helps us speak with the text’s gravity and with the Lord’s patience in view.

Closing Recommendation

We recommend this as a strong mid level guide for preaching and teaching 2 Kings. It will help us keep the covenant framework clear, and it will support proclamation that warns, comforts, and ultimately points to the Lord’s faithful saving purpose.

1 Kings

Mid-levelBusy pastorsStrong recommendation
8.1
Author: John N. Oswalt
Bible Book: 1 Kings
Series: Evangelical Exegetical Commentary
Type: Expository
Publisher: Lexham Press
Theological Perspective: Broadly Evangelical
Resource Type: Commentary

Summary

First Kings is a book about the splendour and the fracture of the kingdom, and beneath that, about the faithfulness of the Lord and the unfaithfulness of His people. John N. Oswalt’s volume in the Evangelical Exegetical Commentary series aims to help us read the book as theology shaped history. We are shown the glory of Solomon, the building of the temple, the tragic drift into idolatry, and the eventual division that follows covenant compromise. It is a book that can preach with force to any church tempted to trade obedience for success.

This commentary serves pastors by keeping the narrative logic and covenant categories in view. The highs of Solomon’s wisdom and the temple dedication are not merely inspirational moments. They are covenant realities, the Lord giving rest, and the Lord placing His name. The lows are not merely political mistakes. They are spiritual betrayals, where the heart turns from the Lord to other loves. Oswalt helps us see that 1 Kings is not neutral reporting. It is calling for covenant loyalty, and it is warning that idolatry always comes with a cost.

The Elijah narratives then provide a sharp contrast. When the nation drifts, the Lord raises a prophet who confronts false worship and calls the people back to the living God. Oswalt helps us keep Carmel and its aftermath connected to the book’s wider argument. The question is not, can Elijah do miracles. The question is, who is God, and will Israel listen. That makes these chapters deeply relevant for a church living in a pluralistic age, yet the application must remain anchored in the text’s own emphasis.

Strengths

First, the commentary supports faithful sermon structure. Oswalt often clarifies how scenes hang together, where the narrative is moving, and why certain details are emphasised. That helps us avoid preaching 1 Kings as disconnected episodes. We can instead show the steady descent from glory to division, and then the Lord’s merciful interventions through prophetic ministry.

Second, there is a clear concern for theological coherence. The covenant promises to David, the role of the temple, and the meaning of wisdom are treated in ways that serve biblical theology. That is particularly useful in a book that can feel politically complex. Oswalt keeps reminding us that the real issue is worship and obedience, not mere statecraft.

Third, the writing is serviceable for pastors. It is not a quick devotional, but it is not impenetrable either. It gives enough engagement to strengthen confidence in the text, and it offers interpretive clarity on the passages most likely to raise questions.

Limitations

Those wanting a strongly confessional Reformed synthesis at every turn will need to supply that in their preaching, even though the commentary’s instincts are often compatible. Some sections may also leave you wanting more explicit guidance on bridging from Old Testament narrative to Christ centred proclamation. The material equips, but it expects the preacher to do the final homiletical work.

How We Would Use It

We would use this volume for series planning and for key theological chapters, particularly Solomon’s reign, the temple narratives, and the Elijah material. It can also help with discipleship teaching on idolatry, because it exposes the subtle ways compromise grows, often under the guise of wisdom and pragmatism.

In pastoral conversations, 1 Kings is a mirror for the church. When we are tempted to measure health by visible success, this book calls us to measure faithfulness by covenant loyalty. Oswalt’s commentary helps keep that message sharp and grounded.

Closing Recommendation

We recommend this as a useful mid level guide for preaching and teaching 1 Kings. It will help us keep the book’s covenant seriousness in view, and it will serve proclamation that aims to call God’s people back to true worship.

2 Samuel

Mid-levelPastors-in-trainingStrong recommendation
8.1
Author: Harry A. Hoffner
Bible Book: 2 Samuel
Series: Evangelical Exegetical Commentary
Type: Expository
Publisher: Lexham Press
Theological Perspective: Broadly Evangelical
Resource Type: Commentary

Summary

Second Samuel holds together triumph and tragedy. The kingdom is established, the promises to David are set in place, and the hope of a lasting throne shines brightly. Yet the same book exposes the wreckage of sin, the cost of power, and the bitter consequences that ripple through a household and a nation. Harry A. Hoffner’s volume in the Evangelical Exegetical Commentary series aims to help us preach and teach this book with honesty and theological steadiness. We need both, because 2 Samuel refuses simplistic moral lessons.

This commentary helps us see the book’s main line. David is the Lord’s chosen king, yet he is also a sinner in need of mercy. The covenant promises are firm, yet the discipline of the Lord is real. The narrative is not trying to entertain. It is teaching Israel, and us, what life under the Lord’s kingship looks like, and why the ultimate hope cannot rest on even the best of human kings. That prepares the way for Christ, not through shallow parallels, but through the deep tension of promise and failure.

Hoffner is particularly useful when working through the middle of the book, the Bathsheba narrative, Nathan’s confrontation, and the long shadow that follows. These chapters can easily be mishandled, either softened to protect David, or preached in a way that becomes voyeuristic and harsh. The commentary encourages us to keep the author’s purpose in view. The text is exposing sin, vindicating the Lord’s justice, and magnifying the Lord’s mercy, while also showing the seriousness of covenant privilege.

Strengths

First, the commentary supports careful narrative preaching. It helps us observe pacing, speeches, and turning points. That is essential in 2 Samuel, where the structure itself carries meaning. For example, the covenant promise of chapter 7 is not just a theological highlight. It is placed to shape how we read everything that follows. Hoffner helps us treat that chapter as a lens, promise does not erase discipline, and discipline does not cancel promise.

Second, the treatment is pastorally realistic. We are helped to see the damage of sin without descending into cynicism. We are also helped to see the possibility of repentance without turning repentance into a technique. The emphasis is not, be like David. The emphasis is, fear the Lord, repent when confronted, and recognise that even the most gifted servant is not the Saviour.

Third, there is value for theological synthesis. The themes of kingship, covenant, and temple preparation are handled in a way that can strengthen biblical theology. This helps pastors connect the book to the wider storyline without skipping the hard work of exegesis.

Limitations

As with the companion volume, the size and detail mean this is not a last minute resource. Pastors will need to use it selectively, especially in weeks where the narrative is straightforward. There may also be places where you want more direct help in moving from explanation to proclamation. The series aims to equip you for that work, rather than doing it for you.

How We Would Use It

We would use this commentary at three points. First, in planning the series, to identify natural preaching units and to clarify the role of chapter 7 in the overall argument. Second, in the heavy pastoral chapters, to ensure we are handling the text with fidelity and with suitable restraint. Third, in the later chapters, where conflict and consequence can feel repetitive, to keep the narrative purpose clear so sermons do not become mere retelling.

For leadership training, 2 Samuel is a gift, and this commentary can help leaders face the text honestly. It teaches us that public ministry does not immunise the heart, and that the Lord’s kindness is never permission to sin. It also steadies us with the reminder that the Lord keeps His promises, even when His servants fail.

Closing Recommendation

We recommend this as a substantial, steady mid level guide for preaching 2 Samuel. It will especially help pastors who want to handle the book’s darkest chapters with integrity, and to keep covenant promise and moral seriousness together.