Summary
This is a relatively concise Leviticus commentary compared to other Old Testament Library volumes, yet it still reflects a firmly academic and critical approach. The work focuses on analysis of the text, its composition, and the meaning of its ritual and legal instructions within ancient Israel.
Because of its era and method, the commentary often approaches Leviticus through the lens of source and tradition discussion. It can still be useful for understanding older critical frameworks that have influenced later scholarship, and it can occasionally clarify the flow of legal material. It is not designed for direct pastoral application, and it will not naturally guide a preacher toward Christ centred exposition.
Strengths
The commentary can help readers see how Leviticus is organised. Where the book can feel repetitive or opaque, the author often attempts to map sections and clarify how different blocks of material relate. That structural help can be valuable when planning a teaching series or when trying to avoid treating the book as a random list.
It also offers a window into mid twentieth century critical scholarship, which still shapes discussion in some settings. For advanced students, that historical awareness can be useful, especially when reading more recent works that assume earlier categories without explanation.
In places, the work can help with basic explanation of ritual material, giving readers language for what is happening and why it mattered within Israel.
Limitations
The limitations are significant for confessional use. The commentary often prioritises critical reconstruction and may treat key elements as later developments in ways that can undermine a straightforward reading of the book as Scripture. The approach can also feel dated in places, both in the questions asked and in the confidence of certain reconstructions.
There is little movement toward the theological unity of Scripture. If you are preaching Leviticus, you will need a clearer biblical theological pathway to Christ, and you will likely want a commentary that is stronger on pastoral use and gospel shape.
Finally, the shorter length means some passages receive limited engagement, so it may not answer detailed exegetical questions.
How We Would Use It
We would use this as a supplementary resource for advanced study, mainly to understand older scholarly arguments and to compare how interpretive frameworks have shifted. It can be useful in an academic setting or for readers who want to trace the history of discussion.
For preaching, it would not be our main guide. If you consult it, do so with a clear confessional centre, and treat reconstructions as hypotheses rather than conclusions. Use any structural help it offers, then build exposition from the passage in its canonical context, showing how Leviticus trains the church to understand holiness, sin, mediation, and the need for a better priest.
Closing Recommendation
A short, historically significant critical Leviticus commentary that may help advanced comparison, but most pastors will want more theologically directed help for preaching and teaching.