Summary
This academic commentary reads Habakkuk as prophetic dialogue, giving voice to moral outrage, confusion, and the struggle to trust God’s rule when evil appears to triumph. It is attentive to form and structure, tracing movement from complaint to divine response, from vision to waiting, and from struggle to worship. The method is critical and analytical, offering careful description and interpretation within scholarly horizons.
The exposition highlights how Habakkuk legitimises honest prayer. It does not treat lament as unbelief, but as faithful speech that refuses to let go of God. The commentary also gives attention to the final chapter as a hymn of trust, where fear and joy coexist and where faith is expressed as rejoicing in God when circumstances remain bleak.
Pastors will find help for structure and for honouring the text’s emotional honesty. They will also need to connect Habakkuk more explicitly to the gospel and to a canonical account of faith and righteousness.
Strengths
The handling of the book’s movement is often strong. Habakkuk is presented as a coherent journey rather than as isolated lines. That can help preachers shape sermons that follow the text’s progression, allowing hearers to feel the weight of the complaint and the surprise of the answer. The focus on waiting and steadfast trust can be pastorally fruitful, especially in seasons when the church feels unsettled or weary.
There is also useful attention to the hymn like character of chapter 3. The commentary helps readers see how worship functions as faith in action, not denial, but a deliberate turning toward God as the only solid ground.
Limitations
The main limitation is theological fulfilment. Christian preaching must proclaim how faith and righteousness are clarified and fulfilled in Christ, and how the Lord answers the deepest complaint not only by judging evil, but by saving sinners. This volume tends to remain within more general theological reflection rather than moving decisively toward gospel proclamation.
Academic discussions can also intrude in ways that slow sermon preparation. Those sections may be useful for students, but pastors should filter them and keep the text’s pastoral purpose central.
How We Would Use It
We would use this as a secondary resource to clarify structure and to support careful handling of lament and trust. It can help you avoid platitudes and honour the real struggle in the text. For preaching, we would pair it with a more confessionally aligned commentary that traces Habakkuk through the canon and into Christ, especially on the themes of faith, righteousness, and waiting. It is well suited to advanced teaching settings where students need to engage critical scholarship with discernment.
Closing Recommendation
A thoughtful academic guide that can sharpen your reading of Habakkuk’s dialogue and worship. It is not a complete preaching companion on its own, because it lacks a consistently Christ centred canonical synthesis. Use with caution, and lean on richer biblical theology for pulpit work.
Theodore Hiebert
Theodore Hiebert is an American Old Testament scholar of the contemporary period, working within a critical academic framework.
He has written on Genesis and Israelite religion, often exploring creation traditions, ecology, and the shaping of biblical texts in their ancient Near Eastern setting. His work engages comparative studies and literary analysis.
Hiebert is valued for clarity of argument and careful contextual study. His scholarship encourages readers to situate biblical literature within its wider cultural world and to reflect on its enduring themes with intellectual honesty.
Theological Perspective: Non-Evangelical/Critical