Summary
This volume treats Isaiah 40 to 66 with sustained attention to structure, rhetoric, and theological themes, while also engaging the scholarly questions surrounding authorship, setting, and the shaping of the text. The author frequently highlights how the material develops hope after judgement, speaking comfort to exiles and setting out a vision of the Lord as the unrivalled Redeemer. Readers should expect a serious academic commentary that aims to explain the text as literature and as religious proclamation within Israel, rather than a confessional guide designed for pulpit and parish.
Strengths
The exposition is often strong on the movement of argument and imagery. Key passages are traced with sensitivity to repetition, contrast, and the way motifs gather force over time. The sustained emphasis on the Lord as Creator and Saviour can help readers see why these chapters have carried such weight in the church, even if the commentary does not foreground that reception. Where the Servant songs arise, the author provides careful literary analysis, notes major interpretive options, and points out the tensions and surprises that make these poems so compelling. The work is also helpful for understanding the rhetoric of consolation, the polemic against idols, and the renewed summons to trust the Lord alone.
Limitations
For evangelical and Reformed readers, the limitations again sit in method and endpoint. The commentary tends to treat critical hypotheses as a controlling horizon, and it can be hesitant to read the text as a unified prophetic witness that finds its fulfilment in Christ. Canonical connections may be acknowledged but not pursued with confidence, and messianic readings can be treated mainly as later developments rather than as the goal of the prophetic message. That means pastors will need to do extra work to move from textual analysis to gospel proclamation. There is also a risk that readers, especially those newer to critical study, absorb sceptical conclusions without recognising how much depends on prior commitments about Scripture.
How We Would Use It
Use this for close study of difficult poetry and for help tracking themes across extended sections. It can sharpen your reading of metaphor and structure, and it can expose interpretive questions you might otherwise miss. Treat it as one voice in the room, not the final word. Pair it with a commentary that reads Isaiah within the whole canon, and keep the New Testament use of Isaiah close to hand, particularly where Isaiah 40 to 66 shapes the language of the gospel and the identity of the Servant. For teaching contexts, this is best reserved for advanced students who can weigh arguments and assumptions.
Closing Recommendation
A serious academic treatment with many fine literary observations, but it is not a safe primary guide for Christian proclamation. Consult it selectively and with clear theological boundaries.
Christopher R. Seitz
Christopher R. Seitz is an American theologian and Old Testament scholar in the contemporary era, working within a broadly orthodox Anglican and evangelical tradition.
He is known for canonical and theological interpretation of Scripture, especially the prophets and the relationship between Old and New Testaments. His work pushes readers to attend to the final form of the text and to the way Scripture speaks as a unified witness.
Seitz is valued for clarity, intellectual seriousness, and a steady insistence that exegesis serves the church. He helps pastors and students read the prophets as Christian Scripture, with careful attention to context, theology, and the larger story of redemption.
Theological Perspective: Broadly Evangelical