Mark

AdvancedAdvanced students / scholarsUse with caution
Bible Book: Mark
Type: Academic
Publisher: Abingdon Press
Theological Perspective: Non-Evangelical / Critical
Resource Type: Commentary
Last updated: February 24, 2026
Looking for alternatives? Compare Mark commentaries.

Evaluation

Overall Score: 5.3/10

Publication Date(s): 1995
Pages: 1104
ISBN: 9780687278213
Faithfulness to the Text: 5.2/10
The author engages the narrative closely, but critical priorities can mute the force of Mark as apostolic witness.
Christ Centredness: 2.4/10
Jesus is the centre of Mark, yet the commentary often stops short of drawing the confession Mark presses upon readers.
Depth of Insight: 7/10
Good narrative and thematic engagement offers real help for advanced study.
Clarity of Writing: 7.1/10
Generally clear, with a steady pace and readable explanation of narrative features.
Pastoral Usefulness: 3.6/10
Useful mainly for preparation and background, with limited direct help for preaching and application.
Readability: 6.7/10
Readable for many ministers, though technical discussion is present and sometimes assumes prior knowledge.

Summary

At a Glance

Length
1104 pages
Type
Academic
Theo. Perspective
Non-Evangelical / Critical
Overall score
5.3 / 10

This commentary on Mark offers an academic treatment of the Gospel with attention to narrative, community setting, and interpretive history. The author explores how Mark portrays Jesus, the disciples, and the conflict that intensifies toward the cross, while also engaging scholarly debates about sources and tradition. It is designed primarily for serious study rather than for preaching, and it does not aim to work within a confessional evangelical framework.

Strengths

Mark benefits from careful narrative reading, and this volume often provides it. The author highlights the pace and urgency of the Gospel, the repeated misunderstandings of the disciples, and the way Mark frames the identity of Jesus through actions, conflict, and suffering. Readers may find helpful observations on the secrecy motif, the escalating opposition, and the central role of the passion narrative. Background and historical discussion can help clarify social and religious settings, and the commentary often points out how a scene functions within the wider argument of the Gospel.

Limitations

The limitations arise where critical approaches become determinative and where theological conclusions are held with more distance than Christian proclamation requires. Mark is a Gospel that presses the reader to confess Jesus as the Christ who suffers and reigns, and the commentary may describe that pressure without drawing it to a confessional conclusion. Pastoral usefulness is also limited by the lack of guidance on application and by a tendency to treat interpretive questions as primarily academic rather than as matters of faith, repentance, and discipleship. Preachers will often need to do significant synthesis work to move from analysis to proclamation.

How We Would Use It

Use this as a study resource for checking narrative observations, understanding debated questions, and seeing how scholarly discussion frames key Markan themes. It may be particularly helpful when preparing to teach Mark in an academic or advanced Bible study setting. For sermon work, use it as a secondary source, and keep a clear confessional companion at hand. Let the immediate context and the Gospel as a whole drive your sermon structure, and let the cross and resurrection sit at the centre of your application.

Closing Recommendation

A competent academic commentary with useful narrative observations, but it should be used with caution as a primary guide for preaching. Best consulted selectively alongside more confessionally aligned works.

Where to buy
exlib_wtb_inserted

Classification

  • Level: Advanced
  • Best For: Advanced students / scholars
  • Priority: Use with caution

Build your shelf for this Bible book

Top picks connected to this Bible book, plus a few trusted global staples.

Commentary

Bible Atlas

Reviewed by

An Expositor

↑ Back to the top
Previous review: Mark